Its an equal protection issue. We now have laws (hate crimes) that define sexuality as a specific class, alongside race and gender.

If you’ve defined sexuality as something that requires protection, than that protection must extend in other areas.

I may not have all the details right, but the argument doesn’t have to go much farther than that. Every law, in any state, that blocks people from entering into a marriage contract with one another is unconstitutional. Take all the opinion polls you want, its unconstitutional and I believe it will eventually be ruled as such.

Source: ronbailey

42 Notes/ Hide

  1. ennuiwillrockyou reblogged this from wadcity
  2. andeventhis reblogged this from sade
  3. sade reblogged this from ronbailey
  4. edkohler reblogged this from doublejack and added:
    What Dan doesn’t seem to realize is that this is all about oil.
  5. dbmurphy reblogged this from ronbailey and added:
    I totally agree with this bloke. Some points of my own: 1. The State has no business telling a person who they may or...
  6. karion reblogged this from davislove
  7. doublejack reblogged this from ronbailey and added:
    This. From now until legal gay marriage is the law of the land, any time there’s a vote like Prop. 8 in California or...
  8. ajschuster reblogged this from ronbailey and added:
    “Every single marriage is whatever the two people in it say that it is.”
  9. davislove reblogged this from ronbailey
  10. ronbailey posted this

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus