Mad Thoughts

scottfriday:

“Depending on the amount of time and participants, we define a project for every workshop.”

“Although each methodology is unique, typically costs go up from heuristic evaluation to lab usability, to site visits, and the opportunities for learning about your customers also increase in that order.”

“Depending on the amount of time and participants, we define a project for every workshop.”

“Although each methodology is unique, typically costs go up from heuristic evaluation to lab usability, to site visits, and the opportunities for learning about your customers also increase in that order.”

Source: scottfriday

View Separately

For sharing with that special someone.

(via someecards)

Question of a provocative nature

The wife and I are at the drug store. As we wait for pharmacy counter help, I see a young man and woman, obviously a couple, browsing the family planning area.

Specifically, the lube.

They pick up a bottle of plain old KY, skipping the generic brand. Big spenders.

Anyway, I immedaitely theorize that it’s for anal play, but wifey insisted that I was wrong. She believed that the chances it was going to be used for butt play were very low. My theory was that, minus some personal issues regarding sexual arousal levels, lubrication between a man and woman would, inevitable, lead to butt stuff and that more than likely, the lube was specifically for butt stuff.

Who’s correct or incorrect?

Well, that pretty much sums it up

newsweek:

Zoosk, the online dating site, asked 5,000 singles how they’d feel about receiving unexpected lewd photos.

61% of gals said “creepy”; 71% of dudes said “sexy.”

And there you have it, folks.

Newsweek tagged this “#this is why men don’t understand women.”

I would say, “#this is why nobody understands anybody.”

Source: jessbennett

View Separately

Your mother was taking break from her orgy. She stopped counting her threesomes after you turned 16.

via postsecret.com

Source: postsecret.com

View Separately

everythinginthesky:

Being Darth Vader’s lover must suck. If just kinda fooling around, you’re left choosing between a robotic-hand-job or some kind of weird, heavy-breathing helmet-job. And if you get more serious, you just know he’s probably into that force-choking thing in the bedroom.
And it’s probably going to all go down in that strange sphere-thing he (presumably) sleeps in, and that’s gonna be cold, sterile and probably smell a little of his weird suit, which I always imagine (for no good reason) smells kinda like sweaty lemonade. There’s always a chance that a minion will open up his weird, hissing sphere-room too, you know, mid-helmet-job, and that poor bastard is almost certainly going to be force-choked, and not in a sexy way. Unless, oh God, it somehow starts turning into a sexy way, you know, like those fantasies where your girlfriend’s hot friend walks in half-way and she’s kinda into it, only with this it’s a weird, Nazi-looking guy with a British accent and Darth Vader is ‘downstairs’ trying to make sure your junk doesn’t get caught in his helmet grill because, wow, awkward.
Yikes.
No, siree, I would not want to sleep with Darth Vader.

And he insists on calling you Padme.

Or is it Qui-gon?

Source: everythinginthesky

The Big Lies People Tell In Online Dating via OkCupid

Okcupid’s blog drops another amazing batch of data related to the habits to people using its online dating service. Really interesting insights on how people lie about their income and the behaviors of bisexuals on the site.

Also some really interesting data on how people lie about their height. People, according to their data, generally add two inches to their height. Guys, whose height gets closed to 6 feet, round up more and more.

Source: blog.okcupid.com

Now that the sex lives of Supreme Court justices have become grist for commentators, we are finally free to discuss a question formerly only whispered about in the shadows: Why does Justice Antonin Scalia, by common consent the leading intellectual force on the Court, have nine children? Is this normal? Or should I say “normal,” as some people choose to define it? Can he represent the views of ordinary Americans when he practices such a minority lifestyle? After all, having nine children is far more unusual in this country than, say, being a lesbian. Let me be clear: the issue is not the fact that Scalia has chosen to have nine children. That is his personal business. The question is whether he is an extremist advocate of the so-called “Nine Children Agenda.” Can he deal open-mindedly with children’s issues when he has so many himself? Can he persuade his children to recuse themselves when appropriate? Speculation is already rampant about why Scalia chose nine children over a more conventional lifestyle. Is he a sex maniac? That suspicion naturally arises…

Michael Kinsley, “Sex Lives of Supreme Court Justices” (via thetimelime, tart-tart)

SCALIA = SEX MANIAC.

(via mandalay)

Source: thetart

View Separately

That’s what she said.

(via art-or-porn)

Source: art-or-porn

View Separately

helloszabi:

my-my-my:

Alex: Dad, what’s Jagermeister?

Phil: Well, you know how in a fairytale there’s always a potion that makes the princess fall asleep and the guys start kissing her? Well, this is kind of like that, except you don’t wake up in a castle, you wake up in a Frat house with a bad reputation.

Source: my-my-my

View Separately

Shouldn’t this have read, “I’ve had two girlfriends that I’ve never brought to orgasm.”

Or, “I once licked the ears of two women incessantly. I licked the ears at variable speeds and with variable pressure. I’ve never heard from these woman again.”

via Post Secret

Source: postsecret.blogspot.com

View Separately

I don’t get it. Why would you care?

So does this mean that people that support same-sex marriage might vote against universal health care? :)

salsus:

thedailywhat:

Chart of the Day: “Explicit Support for Same-Sex Marriage by State and Age” (pdf) by Jeff Lax and Justin Phillips of the Department of Political Science at Columbia University. Created using data collected for a joint paper on gay rights.

Prof. Lax breaks it down:

Seven states cross the 50% mark overall as of our current estimates, but the generation gap is huge. If policy were set by state-by-state majorities of those 65 or older, none would allow same-sex marriage. If policy were set by those under 30, only 12 states would not allow-same-sex marriage.

[via.]